Why Tesla Motors Deserves Their Loan
Tesla Motors says all systems are go on unveiling their all-electric, “Model S” sedan by mid-2011. All except a $450 million (not billion) loan by the federal government. Referred to as “Silicon Valley’s solution to the nation’s energy problem,” Tesla says the Big Three’s inability to develop an all-electric vehicle spurred their motivation to try and become the first.
Taking into account Washington’s financial commitment to GM, Ford, and Chrysler, it seems only logical that the government would lend another American car company the money, especially since Tesla’s latest vehicle corresponds directly with the new administration’s agenda to increase the development of “greener” vehicles. Also, when’s the last time a company or institution approached the U.S. government for a loan under $500 million?
The Model S, which Tesla says would be the first mass-manufactured all-electric car, will cost $57,400, or $49,900 after tax credits. [Elon Musk, the company’s chief executive] said that, when gas savings are taken into account, buying a Model S will be comparable to buying a $35,000 Ford sedan. “Would you rather have this car or a Ford Taurus?” he asked, pointing to the sporty silver prototype.
Further proof that Tesla Motors deserves this loan is how the Model S stacks up against the competition — General Motor’s electric vehicle called the “Volt.” While Tesla claims the Model S can get 300 miles on a single battery charge, the Volt’s target range is only 40 miles on electrical power:
”Forty miles might be a sweet spot for making sure a lot of people get to work without using gasoline, but you’re doing it at a cost that will never be repaid in fuel savings,” Jeremy Michalek, an engineering professor who led the study, said.
An extremely small automaker with significant consumer demand, Tesla Motors has only one other model — a $109,000 Roadster sports car with 1,000 people on a waiting list.
Readers: In your opinion, does Tesla Motors deserve the $450 million loan?
March 28th, 2009 at 11:25 am
Quick correction: Ford has received no financial help from the U.S. government. Our statement on that can be found at: http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=29604
Scott Monty
Global Digital Communications
Ford Motor Company
March 30th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Scott,
The blog article doesn’t state that Ford received any cash, it mentions the U.S.’s “financial commitment” to Ford: “Taking into account Washington’s financial commitment to GM, Ford, and Chrysler…” The automaker requested a $9 billion line of credit that they said they would use only if they needed it (from your statement):
Despite the fact that Ford hasn’t needed to access the line of credit, the U.S. still expressed a willingness to commit Ford the funds if they needed it. It comes down to the U.S.’s commitment, not Ford’s acceptance.
Thanks for your comment,
Tim
March 30th, 2009 at 3:49 pm
I have to applaud this post, particularly because we know that money often has diminishing marginal returns. Even if Tesla goes out of business, they will have done a huge amount of promoting the visibility and potential superiority of all-electric vehicles. When have the big three done the same? Regardless of whether Ford is taking money, they have let down on the promise that large industries do need to make to the people that they employ and who consume their goods: we will do better, always better, for you.
Tesla is doing that: Scott, can you say the same?
March 31st, 2009 at 10:50 am
Thanks Matt I appreciate that. We have to salute a company that’s willing to do things other aren’t, or aren’t doing as fast. It’s no wonder why the Big Three are in dire straits…To the outside world it seems that they’ve been slow to develop these types of vehicles and do so effectively. You mean to tell a company like GM, who has received billions (outside their latest bailouts) to develop alternative vehicles, could only come up with an electric car that can go 40 miles on a single charge…that’s nothing compared to Tesla’s technology.
Tesla deserves this money, and I hope they get it!
Good to hear from you again,
Tim
April 11th, 2009 at 1:01 am
[...] Why Tesla Motors Deserves Their Loan (hsh.com) Related Items: NADA Official Used Car Guide (NADA Official Used Car Guide: Consumer Edition) NADA Marine Appraisal Guide 2008 ; Boats from 7′ – 75′ in Length Popularity: unranked [?]SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “Tesla Motors CEO Calls Writer “A Huge Douchebag””, url: “http://www.blippitt.com/tesla-motors-ceo-calls-writer-a-huge-douchebag” }); Sphere: Related Content Tweet This Did you enjoy this post? Be sure to get the feed. Have you seen our Master CPA List? Follow us on Twitter. Related Websites [...]
August 20th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
Honestly, it would be better for all of us if business depended on the open market and not government to fund their venture. Government takes the zest out of capitalism. Additionally, its not like the citizens of the US took a vote on this matter. Allow for investors to recieve the proper risk/reward for investing. So, thumbs down to Tesla receiving a LOI from the US Government.
August 21st, 2009 at 11:21 am
B.L.,
Thanks for commenting. If you say “thumbs down to Tesla,” do you also say ‘thumbs down to GM and Chrysler’? I really struggle with giving two failing companies billions and not giving anything to a small, up and coming American Biz.
Hope to hear from you soon,
Tim