dcsimg
Blog
February 18th, 2009

Of Populism and CEO Pay Limits

by

 

A last-minute insertion into the ’stimulus’ bill — limits on bank CEO compensation — is likely to have unintended consequences:

But CEOs at even midtier and much smaller banks are paid far more than the $500,000 limit set by the White House, or the bonus cap of one-third of total compensation set by the new amendment. For instance, M&T Bank (MTB) has assets of $65 billion and has received $600 million from the U.S. Treasury. CEO Robert Wilmers’ compensation in 2007 totaled $1.15 million, which included a salary of $646,154 with the rest coming from bonuses and other items such as pension benefits.

The clause was the idea of Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn), who saw a way to capitalize on taxpayer anger at ‘fat cats’ whose banks are receiving government bailout money (or were pressured to take it). Dodd, of course, is infamous for his role as a Friend of Angelo, by which he “received loans from Countrywide Financial through a little-known program that waived points, lender fees and company borrowing rules for prominent people.” But leave that aside for now.

In any event, as Michael Kinsley notes, the critics of this move have several valid points:

First is that restrictions on things like bonuses are easy to evade, simply by relabeling them as salary, which is either unrestricted or less so. This, the critics note (with exasperation, and some justification), will break the connection between pay and performance that was considered so crucial during other banker-burning festivals of recent years. Second, compensation ceilings limited to executives at troubled banks that have received government money will put these banks at a disadvantage in the competition for talent — just when they need talent the most. And third, the rules give these bank executives a strong incentive to pay back the government too quickly, in order to be free of the restrictions on their pay.

There’s also the point that — let’s face it — being in charge of a large business isn’t easy. To attract top-level talent, you need to pay. Flame away if you must, but that’s the same argument used by everyone from professional athletes to your neighborhood school’s principal — and some of them bomb out spectacularly, too. And if you’re honest, you’ll admit that faced with a choice of jobs, you’ll likely take the higher-paying one.

And even more on point: Even if you believe that the biggest bank CEOs are incompetent, greedy, malicious, or some combination, it’s hardly fair — though it’s undeniably convenient politically — to tar other banks with the same big brush.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
  • BlinkList
  • Live
  • Reddit

Leave a Comment

Receive Updates via Email

Delivered by FeedBurner

About the HSH Blog

HSH.com's daily blog focuses on the latest developments in the mortgage and housing markets. Our mission is to relate how changes in mortgage rates and housing policy, as well as the latest financial news, impacts consumers, homebuyers and industry insiders alike. Our 30-plus years of experience in the mortgage industry gives us an edge as we break down the latest changes in an ever-changing market.

Our bloggers:

Tim Manni

Tim Manni is the Managing Editor of HSH.com and the author of their daily blog, which concentrates on the latest developments in the mortgage and housing markets.

Connect With Us

  • rss feed icon
  • facebook icon
  • twitter icon

Compare Lowest Mortgage Rates

$