<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More TARP recipients want out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hsh.com/index.php/2009/03/more-tarp-recipients-want-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hsh.com/index.php/2009/03/more-tarp-recipients-want-out/</link>
	<description>Things you should know about consumer news and finance.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:21:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog Traffic</title>
		<link>http://blog.hsh.com/index.php/2009/03/more-tarp-recipients-want-out/comment-page-1/#comment-5001</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hsh.com/?p=3241#comment-5001</guid>
		<description>The public has every right to be upset at retention bonuses that are 4 million dollars and up.

Are these merit bonuses??

I don&#039;t think so, unless you assert creating monumental losses is meritorious.

It seems that executives are making the claim (often self-erving) that the retention bonuses serve to retain knowledgeable people WHO CAN CLEAN UP THE MESS.

The public is outraged because of the distinct possiblity that the &quot;clean up crew&quot; is substantially the same as the &quot;wrecking crew&quot;.

And firms like AIG have done a very poor job of delineating that that identity is not the case.

Just my 2 cents worth.

Robert A. Kearse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public has every right to be upset at retention bonuses that are 4 million dollars and up.</p>
<p>Are these merit bonuses??</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so, unless you assert creating monumental losses is meritorious.</p>
<p>It seems that executives are making the claim (often self-erving) that the retention bonuses serve to retain knowledgeable people WHO CAN CLEAN UP THE MESS.</p>
<p>The public is outraged because of the distinct possiblity that the &#8220;clean up crew&#8221; is substantially the same as the &#8220;wrecking crew&#8221;.</p>
<p>And firms like AIG have done a very poor job of delineating that that identity is not the case.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents worth.</p>
<p>Robert A. Kearse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

