We research, you save.
July 6th, 2009

Has Hiring Languished B/C of Govt. Programs?



Last week CNBC’s Jerry Bowyer asked “why isn’t America hiring?”

…given the political mood in Washington during the past two years which has been far more focused on job creation (or savings) than on general economic growth. The stimuli plans were supposed to be job plans. The auto/bank bailouts cum nationalizations were supposed to be about saving jobs, not ‘Wall Street’. So given two record breaking stimuli within two years, why isn’t America hiring?

Bowyer answers his own question by speculating that “America isn’t hiring precisely because of government policy.” He concludes by writing “Jobs aren’t languishing despite the government’s best efforts. They’re languishing because of them.”

But is that really the case?

Stimulus Bills

President Bush’s stimulus package was designed more around the notion of ‘putting more money into the American peoples’ pockets will cause them to spend more.’ So we would argue that former-President Bush’s stimulus wasn’t specifically centered on job creation. While President Obama has claimed his stimulus package will save and create millions of jobs, the stimulus has yet to make a significant impact on the economy.


Call us realists or cynics, but we think a lot of people would agree with us when we say that the bailouts of the auto and financial industries were never foremost about saving jobs. While the factors that led to the saving of GM and Chrysler certainly focused on preventing an additional massive wave of unemployment, their bailouts had little to do with job creation. In fact every aspect tied to saving GM and Chrysler had to do with downsizing (dealerships, salaries, retirement benefits, etc.).

Take the bailouts in the financial industry — we’d argue that their saving was more about preventing global systemic risk than worrying about jobs. The financial bailouts were intended to save capitalistic economies as a whole, not as a mechanism for JP Morgan Chase to hold on to as many employees as possible.

Certainly bailouts and stimulus packages are intended to bring positive returns. The ability for the bailed-out companies to retain their workforce is a plus, but not the sole reason for their existence. Since most of the recent government efforts which Bowyer referred to weren’t designed first and foremost to create jobs, should we blame them?

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
  • BlinkList
  • Live
  • Reddit

2 Responses to “Has Hiring Languished B/C of Govt. Programs?”

  1. Pauk Says: July 7th, 2009 at 9:39 am

    The sooner the hands get done boiling up more home made bailout remedies, the sooner the economy can begin repairing itself.

  2. Tim Manni Says: July 7th, 2009 at 10:06 am

    Hey Pauk,

    Funny you say that. I just read a Bloomberg article that reports an Obama adviser talked about issuing another stimulus at a forum yesterday. Luckily both the president and vice president have different opinions on the subject, but the discussion scares me.

    Good hearing from you,

Leave a Comment

Receive Updates via Email

Delivered by FeedBurner

About the HSH Blog

HSH.com's daily blog focuses on the latest developments in the mortgage and housing markets. Our mission is to relate how changes in mortgage rates and housing policy, as well as the latest financial news, impacts consumers, homebuyers and industry insiders alike. Our 30-plus years of experience in the mortgage industry gives us an edge as we break down the latest changes in an ever-changing market.

Our bloggers:

Tim Manni

Tim Manni is the Managing Editor of HSH.com and the author of their daily blog, which concentrates on the latest developments in the mortgage and housing markets.

Connect With Us

  • rss feed icon
  • facebook icon
  • twitter icon

Compare Lowest Mortgage Rates