Blog
March 15th, 2011

Conventional loans increasingly slipping away

by Peter Miller

 

4-FHA-logoIf you want to know the difference between conventional mortgages and Federal Housing Administration (FHA) financing, the first item up for discussion is typically the cost of each loan.

For instance, the Wall Street Journal tells us that “conforming mortgages, or those that can be bought by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, commonly require higher down payments than FHA loans require. The catch to an FHA-insured loan is that you’ll pay more in fees.”

Later the Journal explains that “borrowers don’t face those costs on a conforming mortgage with 20% down.” (See: FHA Powers What’s Left of the Home Market, March 6, 2011)

Well, sure, but how realistic is this comparison for most borrowers?

Apples & apples

Let’s begin with the assumption that you’re a rational borrower seeking the lowest mortgage rates. This means that while mortgage rates are important, so too are the availability of cash and the cost of mortgage insurance — if any.

You can borrow from the FHA with as little as 3.5 percent down, but if you do, you’ll need insurance — 1 percent of the loan amount up front plus an annual mortgage insurance premium (MIP) equal to 1.15 percent of the outstanding loan balance.

Alternatively, if you borrow with 20 percent down and get a conventional loan, there’s no mortgage insurance requirement.

So, for purposes of illustration and easy math, let’s say you can borrow $300,000 at 5 percent. The monthly cost for principal and interest over 30 years will be $1610.46.

If you borrow $300,000 from the FHA, you will have the 1 percent up-front charge ($3,000) plus an annual MIP equal to roughly $3,450 — a total of about $6,450 in the first year.

Get that conventional $300,000 loan with 20 percent down and you pay nothing for mortgage insurance.

So, obviously, the conventional loan is the “better” deal. Or is it?

20 percent down

Although the loan amounts are the same the two deals are radically different. A $300,000 FHA loan equaled the purchase price of the property less 3.5 percent down. The actual cost of the home was $310,881. With a conventional loan, the $300,000 in financing equaled 80 percent of the purchase price, or $375,000.

To make the conventional loan work in our example, you first need $75,000 in cash plus closing costs. This requirement means conventional loans without mortgage insurance (you put 20 percent down) are off limits to most borrowers. Here’s why:

The National Association of Realtors reported in its 2010 survey of buyers and sellers that 75 percent of all homes are bought with less than 20 percent down. The average median home price at the end of 2010 was $170,600. Translation: Most buyers did not have the $34,120 in cash it would take to get a conventional loan without mortgage insurance.

The right comparison

But why not a comparison between conventional and FHA loans that really works?

Compare a conventional mortgage with 5 percent down and an FHA mortgage with 5 percent down. The conventional loan will require private mortgage insurance and the FHA loan will require insurance as well.

Which is better? It depends on the prices and terms at the time the loans are being originated — a good reason to speak with mortgage lenders and compare both up-front and monthly costs.

Also, be precise when using that term “better.” FHA loans are insured by the federal government and if you get into financial trouble the FHA will try to work out a settlement of your loan rather than a foreclosure. In fact, HUD boasts that 73 percent of its delinquent loans were cured and not foreclosed in fiscal 2010, a comforting thought in today’s financial world.

But while FHA loans may be “better” in some cases they’re not always preferred. Conventional loans work just fine for many borrowers. They are, after all, conventional mortgages — meaning there are no gotcha clauses or hidden costs. As always, shop around and defend your interests.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
  • BlinkList
  • Live
  • Reddit

4 Responses to “Conventional loans increasingly slipping away”

  1. Over 75% Of Homebuyers Purchased Homes Using Mortgage Insurance In 2010 According To National Survey « FundMyRemodel.com Says: March 15th, 2011 at 11:06 am
  2. Philly Living Blog » Conventional loans – Slipping Away? Says: March 28th, 2011 at 11:35 am

    [...] From: The HSH Blog [...]

  3. Conventional Loan or FHA, Which Is Better? | Life In The Fast Lane Says: August 1st, 2013 at 4:53 pm

    [...] Or is it? 20 percent down Although the loan amounts are the same the two deals are radically different. A $300,000 FHA loan equaled the purchase price of the property less 3.5 percent down. The actual cost of the home was $310,881. Full original article: Conventional loans increasingly slipping away [...]

  4. Lower Down Payments For Conventional Home Loans Back | Just Make Money Online Says: November 12th, 2013 at 7:07 am

    [...] This requirement means conventional loans without mortgage insurance (you put 20 percent down) are off limits to most borrowers. Heres why: The National Association of Realtors reported in its 2010 survey of buyers and sellers that 75 percent of all homes are bought with less than 20 percent down. The average median home price at the end of 2010 was $170,600. Translation: Most buyers did not have the $34,120 in cash it would take to get a conventional loan without mortgage insurance. The right comparison But why not a comparison between conventional and FHA loans that really works? Full original article: Conventional loans increasingly slipping away [...]

Leave a Comment

Receive Updates via Email

Delivered by FeedBurner

About the HSH Blog

HSH.com's daily blog focuses on the latest developments in the mortgage and housing markets. Our mission is to relate how changes in mortgage rates and housing policy, as well as the latest financial news, impacts consumers, homebuyers and industry insiders alike. Our 30-plus years of experience in the mortgage industry gives us an edge as we break down the latest changes in an ever-changing market.

Our bloggers:

Tim Manni

Tim Manni is the Managing Editor of HSH.com and the author of their daily blog, which concentrates on the latest developments in the mortgage and housing markets.

Connect With Us

  • rss feed icon
  • facebook icon
  • twitter icon

Compare Lowest Mortgage Rates

$