July 12th, 2012

Will new mortgage paperwork help housing market?

by Peter Miller


The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) says we need to make the mortgage process simpler and more understandable. This sounds like a good idea, but having just completed a mortgage refinance, I’m not particularly sure that the CFPB is on the right track.

It was in January 2010 that HUD introduced a new form that borrowers were supposed to receive within three days of making a loan application. The 2010 Good Faith Estimate of Closing Costs (GFE) was and is an excellent form, a huge improvement over the paperwork that had previously been used for many years. With the 2010 GFE you could clearly see your interest rate, closing costs and whether the loan had a balloon payment or prepayment penalty.

There is also a federal Truth-in-Lending form, which outlines precise mortgage terms. The CFPB wants to combine both the GFE and the Truth-in-Lending form into a single, readable form called a Loan Estimate.

The real issue, though, has nothing to do with graphic design or plain type. Behind all the claims of readability and convenience what’s really at stake is money.

“Through a simpler and better understanding of their costs,” said then-HUD Secretary Steve Preston in 2008 in explaining the 2010 GFE to come, “consumers can shop more effectively for a mortgage. Based on HUD’s economic analysis, we estimate that improving upfront disclosures on the GFE and limiting the amount that estimated charges could change will save consumers nearly $700 in loan costs.”

A 69 percent rate?

So is the new proposed form any better than the information I got when applying for a loan in just the past few weeks? Will it save anyone more money?

The new Loan Estimate is three pages long versus two pages for the current Truth-in-Lending and three pages for the 2010 GFE, a total of five pages.

The new form certainly has more white space, bigger type and better graphics. To the extent that the form is clear and allows easier loan comparisons it should help borrowers. But it won’t lower mortgage rates and it’s not a great improvement over the current forms

For instance, on page three the Loan Estimate shows the cost of the loan after five years including the interest rate, the total payment cost, the scheduled principal reduction and the interest paid.

Then it shows the “total interest percentage,” or TIP, the “total amount of interest that you will pay over the loan term as a percentage of your loan amount.” In the case of the model form the total interest percentage is 69.447 percent.

In other words if you borrow $162,000 over 30 years at 3.875 percent, the total interest cost over the life of the loan will be $112,240.80 — 69 percent of all monthly payments.

But few mortgages last 30 years and the total interest cost of the loan can change radically by making prepayments. For these reasons it would be fine to include the TIP figure in the new form but with a clearer explanation of what the figure means and that it’s not absolute.

The new form also needs a line to indicate whether the new loan is for a prime residence or an investment property. Mortgage rates vary depending on the use of the property and this is a key factor which should be shown to alert lenders and mortgage investors.

Lastly, the form says borrowers may elect to shop for certain services including title insurance. Right. The CFPB ought to shop for title insurance; they might be surprised at the pricing uniformity they encounter.

The reality is that the forms we have now are much better than they used to be and fixing them is not a major project. Repairing the mortgage system with real reform is much more important, and untouched with the new paperwork.

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
  • BlinkList
  • Live
  • Reddit

One Response to “Will new mortgage paperwork help housing market?”

  1. Ohio FHA Refinance Says: July 12th, 2012 at 12:52 pm

    The old Good Faith Estimate (pre 2010) was a 1 Page disclosure that itemized every single fee, provided the monthly payment, closing costs and estimated cash required at closing.

    The current Good Faith Estimate is 3 pages, does a poor job at itemizing the fees, provides only the principal & interest payment, and does not list the estimated cash required at closing.

    I can only imagine what the final result of the CFPB will be. Until these government agencies actually have people that have dealt with these disclosures design them, they will continue to fall short.

Leave a Comment

Receive Updates via Email

Delivered by FeedBurner

About the HSH Blog

HSH.com's daily blog focuses on the latest developments in the mortgage and housing markets. Our mission is to relate how changes in mortgage rates and housing policy, as well as the latest financial news, impacts consumers, homebuyers and industry insiders alike. Our 30-plus years of experience in the mortgage industry gives us an edge as we break down the latest changes in an ever-changing market.

Our bloggers:

Tim Manni

Tim Manni is the Managing Editor of HSH.com and the author of their daily blog, which concentrates on the latest developments in the mortgage and housing markets.

Connect With Us

  • rss feed icon
  • facebook icon
  • twitter icon

Compare Lowest Mortgage Rates